Responsa for Bava Kamma 137:1
חייב אתה ליתן לו טבח ומכר משלם תשלומי ארבעה וחמשה מ"ט כיון דלא פסקה מילתא אכתי גנב הוא
but if they merely said to him, 'You are liable to pay him,' and after that he slaughtered or sold the animal, he would be liable to pay four-fold or five-fold payment, the reason being that since they have not pronounced final sentence upon the matter he is still a thief?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Subject to the law of paying four-fold and five-fold payments. ');"><sup>1</sup></span> — No, its application is necessary where they have as yet merely said to him, 'You are liable to pay him'.
Teshuvot Maharam
Q. A is the owner of a vineyard. Is he permitted to plant in it branches of a vine that has not yet borne fruit?
A. Whether the branches are taken from a vine that has already borne fruit, or from one that has not yet borne fruit makes no difference. For the life of the new vine begins with the time the branch is planted in the ground. Even if the branch bore fruit before it was replanted, nevertheless, its fruit after replanting will be Orlah for three years. The fruit of the fourth year may be eaten after redeeming it for a penny, grinding the penny and throwing it into the river. However, the fruit from a branch of an old vine, planted in the ground without severing it from the old vine, may be eaten even during the first year.
SOURCES: L. 196; Tashbetz 365.
A. Whether the branches are taken from a vine that has already borne fruit, or from one that has not yet borne fruit makes no difference. For the life of the new vine begins with the time the branch is planted in the ground. Even if the branch bore fruit before it was replanted, nevertheless, its fruit after replanting will be Orlah for three years. The fruit of the fourth year may be eaten after redeeming it for a penny, grinding the penny and throwing it into the river. However, the fruit from a branch of an old vine, planted in the ground without severing it from the old vine, may be eaten even during the first year.
SOURCES: L. 196; Tashbetz 365.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Teshuvot Maharam
Q. A is the owner of a vineyard. Is he permitted to plant in it branches of a vine that has not yet borne fruit?
A. Whether the branches are taken from a vine that has already borne fruit, or from one that has not yet borne fruit makes no difference. For the life of the new vine begins with the time the branch is planted in the ground. Even if the branch bore fruit before it was replanted, nevertheless, its fruit after replanting will be Orlah for three years. The fruit of the fourth year may be eaten after redeeming it for a penny, grinding the penny and throwing it into the river. However, the fruit from a branch of an old vine, planted in the ground without severing it from the old vine, may be eaten even during the first year.
SOURCES: L. 196; Tashbetz 365.
A. Whether the branches are taken from a vine that has already borne fruit, or from one that has not yet borne fruit makes no difference. For the life of the new vine begins with the time the branch is planted in the ground. Even if the branch bore fruit before it was replanted, nevertheless, its fruit after replanting will be Orlah for three years. The fruit of the fourth year may be eaten after redeeming it for a penny, grinding the penny and throwing it into the river. However, the fruit from a branch of an old vine, planted in the ground without severing it from the old vine, may be eaten even during the first year.
SOURCES: L. 196; Tashbetz 365.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy